Search results

I'm using intel dual band AC7265 By the way, after Airportitlwm 2.3.0 got released, I just updated to Sonoma 14.5 and using MacBookPro 15,2 SMBIOS and still having that problem (without using the FeatureUnlock.kext, since the SMBIOS doesn't need that).

I've done that but still didn't work

I’ve used that kext since Monterey and it worked. But now on Ventura it doesn’t work somehow

I've successfully used my Broadwell laptop on Ventura. But somehow Airplay stopped working, the Hackintosh doesn't show up on my iPhone as it was on Monterey. How can I fix it? I'm using MacbookPro 14,1 SMBIOS by the way

Hi, I have a question: does HD 530 on Sonoma be able to decode HEVC 4K videos?

Hi, I have a question: does this method require OCLP to patch the graphics?

Hi, I was wondering the same question. Can you show me where can I get that kext? I've searched but it only shows up on MacMeUp. Is that the right place?

Thanks. I tried and it worked. Now, with everything working, can I enable SIP?

Hi, I'm wondering if this patch will enable all continuity features for my BCM94360CS2 as on Ventura?

I'm having the same issue like you: My specs: HP Prodesk 600 G3 i5 6500 RX 560 4GB 8GB DDR4 RAM Here's my EFI

I have a RX 560 and i5 6500 which has HD 530. I only need my iGPU for computing purposes. Do I have to spoof it? If yes, is there any difference in the device ID or framebuffer?

I measured the boot time and disk speed using Blackmagic disk speed test before and after enabling FileVault. The boot time and disk speed is about the same. Looks like disk performance is not affected much when enabling FileVault. I tested on a KingDian 120GB m.SATA SSD

I'm using SATA SSD, will the speed be affected much?

I have a question: Does enabling FileVault make disk speed slower? I've read some post says that non T2 real-Macs' disk performance decreased when enable FileVault

Oh, I forgot to mention that. As I've mention before, with the same bitrate, H.264 and HEVC have the same file size. So when I exported HEVC to 5000kbps, and H.264 to 10000kbps, HEVC outputted about half the file size compare to H.264 (about 100MB vs 180MB)

Hoping for some interesting informations 😀

I thought so at first. But after doing some research, every information I found says that HEVC can be encoded with half the bitrate yet deliver the same quality compare to H.264. With the same bitrate, HEVC will be sharper I test that out. Tried exporting the same video to H.264 and HEVC at...

I've just found out that after removing unfairgva=5 boot-args, Compressor still uses my GPU for HEVC encoding. But I have to select encoder type to Fast and disable Allow frame reordering. If I choose Slower or both, my CPU will maxed out and my GPU will be like this:

I tried exporting a video to H.264 and HEVC with the same bitrate (50000kbps) and the file size is the same. I don't know why H.264 output a file with slightly lower bitrate, so its file size is a little smaller But HEVC can use half the bitrate and still output the same quality as H.264 with...

I tried adding that boot-args and Compressor now uses my GPU to encode HEVC when I choose export settings as below. Thanks! But Compressor doesn't use my GPU when I choose encoder type as slow or tick "Allow frame reordering" box. is there a way to fix that also?